Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Stow, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Stow, OH.
| Data | Palos park | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,792 | 34,216 |
| Median Age | 59.5 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $128,370 | $89,805 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Palos park vs Stow
- The population in Stow is higher at 34,216, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 39.7 years in Stow.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $89,805 in Stow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 46.0% in Stow.
- The poverty level is higher in Stow at 8%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
- The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.9% in Stow.
Demographics
Demographics Palos park vs Stow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palos park | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 88 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Stow
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Palos park and Stow at 3%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stow at 89% compared to 88% in Palos park.
- In Stow, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Palos park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Palos park at 3% compared to 1% in Stow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palos park at 5% compared to 4% in Stow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palos park and Stow at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palos park | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Stow
- In Stow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stow at 23.6% versus 18.5% in Palos park.
- Stow has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 19.5% in Stow.
- Stow has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stow at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palos park | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (54) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (870) | 14.9% (5,110) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (287) | 3.7% (1,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (2,018) | 33.7% (11,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Stow
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Stow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 14.9% in Stow.
- More residents in Palos park have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 3.7% in Stow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 33.7% in Stow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.