Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Shelbyville, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Shelbyville, TN.

Data Palos park Shelbyville
Population 4,792 24,452
Median Age 59.5 years 31.3 years
Median Income $128,370 $50,694
Married Families 60.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.1

Population Comparison: Palos park vs Shelbyville

  • The population in Shelbyville is higher at 24,452, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
  • Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
  • Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $50,694 in Shelbyville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Shelbyville at 15%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
  • The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.

Demographics

Demographics Palos park vs Shelbyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Palos park Shelbyville
Black 3 11
White 88 51
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 24
Two or More Races 5 12
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Shelbyville

  • In Shelbyville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Palos park.
  • Palos park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 51% in Shelbyville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Palos park at 1% compared to 0% in Shelbyville.
  • Shelbyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 3% in Palos park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shelbyville at 12%, compared to 5% in Palos park.
  • In Shelbyville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Palos park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Palos park Shelbyville
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 20.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 15.6%
Depression 18.5% 27.5%
Smoking 11.5% 25.2%
Binge Drinking 20.8% 14.3%
Obesity 26.7% 39.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Shelbyville

  • In Shelbyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbyville at 27.5% versus 18.5% in Palos park.
  • Shelbyville has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
  • Shelbyville has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbyville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Palos park Shelbyville
No Schooling 1.1% (54) 0.8% (185)
High School Diploma 18.2% (870) 21.6% (5,273)
Less than High School 6.0% (287) 20.7% (5,051)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.1% (2,018) 7.7% (1,889)

Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Shelbyville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Palos park have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Shelbyville.
  • In Shelbyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 18.2% in Palos park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbyville at 20.7%, compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.