Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Mukilteo, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Mukilteo, WA.
| Data | Palos park | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,792 | 21,096 |
| Median Age | 59.5 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $128,370 | $123,036 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Palos park vs Mukilteo
- The population in Mukilteo is higher at 21,096, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 43.6 years in Mukilteo.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $123,036 in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 48.0% in Mukilteo.
- The poverty level is higher in Mukilteo at 5%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
- The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.
Demographics
Demographics Palos park vs Mukilteo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palos park | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 21 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Palos park at 3% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- Palos park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 61% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 1% in Palos park.
- Mukilteo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Palos park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukilteo at 11%, compared to 5% in Palos park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palos park and Mukilteo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palos park | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Mukilteo
- In Mukilteo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mukilteo at 26.5% versus 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palos park at 11.5% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has higher obesity rates at 29.2% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mukilteo at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palos park | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (54) | 0.1% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (870) | 9.7% (2,042) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (287) | 2.0% (414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (2,018) | 38.3% (8,089) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- More residents in Palos park have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 38.3% in Mukilteo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.