Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Middle point, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Middle point, OH.

Data Palos park Middle point
Population 4,792 565
Median Age 59.5 years 37.0 years
Median Income $128,370 $54,479
Married Families 60.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Palos park vs Middle point

  • In Palos park, the population is higher at 4,792, compared to 565 in Middle point.
  • Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 37.0 years in Middle point.
  • Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $54,479 in Middle point.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 44.0% in Middle point.
  • The poverty level is higher in Middle point at 8%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
  • The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Middle point.

Demographics

Demographics Palos park vs Middle point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Palos park Middle point
Black 3 Data is updating
White 88 99
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Middle point

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Palos park at 3% compared to 0% in Middle point.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Middle point at 99% compared to 88% in Palos park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Palos park at 1% compared to 0% in Middle point.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Palos park at 3% compared to 0% in Middle point.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Palos park at 5% compared to 1% in Middle point.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palos park and Middle point at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Palos park Middle point
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 10.5%
Depression 18.5% 23.4%
Smoking 11.5% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 20.8% 19.3%
Obesity 26.7% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Middle point

  • In Middle point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Middle point at 23.4% versus 18.5% in Palos park.
  • Middle point has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 19.3% in Middle point.
  • Middle point has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middle point at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Palos park Middle point
No Schooling 1.1% (54) 1.1% (6)
High School Diploma 18.2% (870) 34.2% (193)
Less than High School 6.0% (287) 13.1% (74)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.1% (2,018) 9.4% (53)

Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Middle point

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Palos park and Middle point at 1.1%.
  • In Middle point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 18.2% in Palos park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Middle point at 13.1%, compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 9.4% in Middle point.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.