Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Lugoff, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Lugoff, SC.
| Data | Palos park | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,792 | 9,423 |
| Median Age | 59.5 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $128,370 | $57,885 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Palos park vs Lugoff
- The population in Lugoff is higher at 9,423, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 39.4 years in Lugoff.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $57,885 in Lugoff.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 43.0% in Lugoff.
- The poverty level is higher in Lugoff at 9%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
- Lugoff has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.0% in Palos park.
Demographics
Demographics Palos park vs Lugoff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palos park | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 21 |
| White | 88 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 73% in Lugoff.
- The Asian population is larger in Palos park at 1% compared to 0% in Lugoff.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Palos park and Lugoff at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palos park at 5% compared to 3% in Lugoff.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palos park and Lugoff at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palos park | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lugoff at 22.5% versus 18.5% in Palos park.
- Lugoff has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 16.7% in Lugoff.
- Lugoff has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lugoff at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palos park | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (54) | 0.9% (83) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (870) | 19.6% (1,843) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (287) | 8.3% (778) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (2,018) | 16.3% (1,537) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Lugoff
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Lugoff.
- In Lugoff, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 18.2% in Palos park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lugoff at 8.3%, compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 16.3% in Lugoff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.