Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Jessup, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Jessup, MD.
| Data | Palos park | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,792 | 9,602 |
| Median Age | 59.5 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $128,370 | $140,561 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Palos park vs Jessup
- The population in Jessup is higher at 9,602, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 36.8 years in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher median income of $140,561, compared to $128,370 in Palos park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 24.0% in Jessup.
- The poverty level is higher in Jessup at 6%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
- The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in Jessup.
Demographics
Demographics Palos park vs Jessup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palos park | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 54 |
| White | 88 | 24 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Jessup
- In Jessup, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 24% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Palos park.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Palos park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jessup at 6%, compared to 5% in Palos park.
- In Jessup, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palos park | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Jessup
- In Jessup, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Palos park at 18.5% compared to 15.4% in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 16.8% in Jessup.
- Jessup has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palos park at 9.0% compared to 2.0% in Jessup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palos park | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (54) | 1.5% (143) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (870) | 15.1% (1,453) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (287) | 24.7% (2,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (2,018) | 18.3% (1,760) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Jessup
- In Jessup, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.1% in Palos park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Jessup.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jessup at 24.7%, compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 18.3% in Jessup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.