Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Farmington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Farmington, CT.
| Data | Palos park | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,792 | 25,340 |
| Median Age | 59.5 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $128,370 | $101,000 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 65.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Palos park vs Farmington
- The population in Farmington is higher at 25,340, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 42.0 years in Farmington.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $101,000 in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 60.0% in Palos park.
- The poverty level is higher in Farmington at 3%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
- The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.0% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Palos park vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palos park | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 88 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Farmington
- In Farmington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 85% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Palos park.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Palos park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palos park at 5% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palos park and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palos park | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Farmington
- More residents in Palos park report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Palos park at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palos park at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Palos park at 26.7% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palos park at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palos park | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (54) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (870) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (287) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (2,018) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- More residents in Palos park have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.