Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Beverly, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Beverly, MA.
| Data | Palos park | Beverly |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,792 | 42,235 |
| Median Age | 59.5 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $128,370 | $99,525 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Palos park vs Beverly
- The population in Beverly is higher at 42,235, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 40.3 years in Beverly.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $99,525 in Beverly.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 40.0% in Beverly.
- The poverty level is higher in Beverly at 5%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
- The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Beverly.
Demographics
Demographics Palos park vs Beverly provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palos park | Beverly |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 88 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Beverly
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Palos park and Beverly at 3%.
- Palos park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 83% in Beverly.
- In Beverly, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Palos park.
- Beverly has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Palos park.
- Both Palos park and Beverly have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palos park and Beverly at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palos park | Beverly |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Beverly
- In Beverly, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beverly at 23.6% versus 18.5% in Palos park.
- Beverly has a higher smoking rate at 11.9% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 18.4% in Beverly.
- Beverly has higher obesity rates at 28.5% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beverly at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palos park | Beverly |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (54) | 0.3% (143) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (870) | 13.0% (5,502) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (287) | 4.0% (1,686) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (2,018) | 36.2% (15,307) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Beverly
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Beverly.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 13.0% in Beverly.
- More residents in Palos park have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 4.0% in Beverly.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 36.2% in Beverly.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.