Demographics details for Palos park, IL vs Bartlesville, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Palos park, IL vs Bartlesville, OK.

Data Palos park Bartlesville
Population 4,792 37,795
Median Age 59.5 years 37.5 years
Median Income $128,370 $58,230
Married Families 60.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.9

Population Comparison: Palos park vs Bartlesville

  • The population in Bartlesville is higher at 37,795, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
  • Residents in Palos park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 37.5 years in Bartlesville.
  • Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370 compared to $58,230 in Bartlesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Palos park at 60.0% compared to 40.0% in Bartlesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bartlesville at 12%, compared to 0% in Palos park.
  • The unemployment rate in Palos park is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Bartlesville.

Demographics

Demographics Palos park vs Bartlesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Palos park Bartlesville
Black 3 4
White 88 70
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 3 7
Two or More Races 5 9
American Indian Data is updating 8

Demographics Comparison: Palos park vs Bartlesville

  • In Bartlesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Palos park.
  • Palos park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 70% in Bartlesville.
  • In Bartlesville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Palos park.
  • Bartlesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Palos park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bartlesville at 9%, compared to 5% in Palos park.
  • In Bartlesville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 0% in Palos park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Palos park Bartlesville
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 12.1%
Depression 18.5% 24.9%
Smoking 11.5% 19.2%
Binge Drinking 20.8% 14.2%
Obesity 26.7% 41.3%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Palos park vs Bartlesville

  • In Bartlesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bartlesville at 24.9% versus 18.5% in Palos park.
  • Bartlesville has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 14.2% in Bartlesville.
  • Bartlesville has higher obesity rates at 41.3% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bartlesville at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Palos park Bartlesville
No Schooling 1.1% (54) 0.7% (275)
High School Diploma 18.2% (870) 16.6% (6,277)
Less than High School 6.0% (287) 9.5% (3,604)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.1% (2,018) 22.2% (8,399)

Education Levels Comparison: Palos park vs Bartlesville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Palos park have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Bartlesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 16.6% in Bartlesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bartlesville at 9.5%, compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Palos park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 22.2% in Bartlesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.