Demographics details for Palmer, MA vs Shelbyville, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Palmer, MA vs Shelbyville, TN.

Data Palmer Shelbyville
Population 3,900 24,452
Median Age 42.0 years 31.3 years
Median Income $65,000 $50,694
Married Families 55.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Palmer vs Shelbyville

  • The population in Shelbyville is higher at 24,452, compared to 3,900 in Palmer.
  • Residents in Palmer have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
  • Palmer has a higher median income of $65,000 compared to $50,694 in Shelbyville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Palmer at 55.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Shelbyville at 15%, compared to 10% in Palmer.
  • The unemployment rate in Palmer is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.

Demographics

Demographics Palmer vs Shelbyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Palmer Shelbyville
Black 1 11
White 96 51
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 24
Two or More Races Data is updating 12
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Palmer vs Shelbyville

  • In Shelbyville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Palmer.
  • Palmer has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 51% in Shelbyville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Palmer at 1% compared to 0% in Shelbyville.
  • Shelbyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 2% in Palmer.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shelbyville at 12%, compared to 0% in Palmer.
  • In Shelbyville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Palmer.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Palmer Shelbyville
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.6%
Depression Data is updating% 27.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 25.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.4%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Palmer vs Shelbyville

  • In Shelbyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbyville at 27.5% versus 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Shelbyville has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Shelbyville at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Shelbyville has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbyville at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Palmer Shelbyville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (185)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.6% (5,273)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.7% (5,051)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.7% (1,889)

Education Levels Comparison: Palmer vs Shelbyville

  • In Shelbyville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • In Shelbyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbyville at 20.7%, compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • In Shelbyville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.