Demographics details for Palm bay, FL vs Griffin, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palm bay, FL vs Griffin, IN.
| Data | Palm bay | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 129,234 | 142 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $62,538 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Palm bay vs Griffin
- In Palm bay, the population is higher at 129,234, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- Residents in Palm bay have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Palm bay has a higher median income of $62,538 compared to $61,250 in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Palm bay.
- Palm bay has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Griffin.
- The unemployment rate in Palm bay is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Griffin.
Demographics
Demographics Palm bay vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palm bay | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | Data is updating |
| White | 51 | 98 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palm bay vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Palm bay at 18% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 98% compared to 51% in Palm bay.
- The Asian population is larger in Palm bay at 2% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Palm bay at 17% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palm bay at 12% compared to 2% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palm bay and Griffin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palm bay | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palm bay vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.8% in Palm bay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Griffin at 26.3% versus 20.3% in Palm bay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palm bay at 19.6% compared to 18.5% in Griffin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Griffin at 17.4% compared to 15.8% in Palm bay.
- Griffin has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 34.9% in Palm bay.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palm bay at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palm bay | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,215) | 1.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (22,173) | 16.9% (24) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (14,805) | 9.9% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (18,880) | 12.0% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palm bay vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Palm bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palm bay hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Griffin.
- More residents in Palm bay have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palm bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 12.0% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.