Demographics details for Palm bay, FL vs Folsom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palm bay, FL vs Folsom, CA.
| Data | Palm bay | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 129,234 | 83,269 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $62,538 | $134,935 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Palm bay vs Folsom
- In Palm bay, the population is higher at 129,234, compared to 83,269 in Folsom.
- Residents in Palm bay have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 39.9 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935, compared to $62,538 in Palm bay.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Palm bay.
- Palm bay has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Folsom.
- The unemployment rate in Palm bay is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Palm bay vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palm bay | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 4 |
| White | 51 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palm bay vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Palm bay at 18% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 54% compared to 51% in Palm bay.
- In Folsom, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 2% in Palm bay.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Palm bay at 17% compared to 14% in Folsom.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palm bay at 12% compared to 10% in Folsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palm bay and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palm bay | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palm bay vs Folsom
- More residents in Palm bay report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Palm bay at 20.3% compared to 17.7% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palm bay at 19.6% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Palm bay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Palm bay at 34.9% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palm bay at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palm bay | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,215) | 0.5% (451) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (22,173) | 7.7% (6,439) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (14,805) | 6.1% (5,119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (18,880) | 36.4% (30,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palm bay vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of residents in Palm bay have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palm bay hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- More residents in Palm bay have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 14.6% in Palm bay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.