Demographics details for Palm bay, FL vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palm bay, FL vs Clarksville, AR.
Data | Palm bay | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Population | 129,234 | 9,555 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $62,538 | $35,911 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Palm bay vs Clarksville
- In Palm bay, the population is higher at 129,234, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Palm bay have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Palm bay has a higher median income of $62,538 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Palm bay at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 10% in Palm bay.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Palm bay.
Demographics
Demographics Palm bay vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Palm bay | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 3 |
White | 51 | 60 |
Asian | 2 | 6 |
Hispanic | 17 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Palm bay vs Clarksville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Palm bay at 18% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksville at 60% compared to 51% in Palm bay.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Palm bay.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 17% in Palm bay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palm bay at 12% compared to 7% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Palm bay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Palm bay | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 16.3% |
Depression | 20.3% | 27.9% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palm bay vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 16.8% in Palm bay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 27.9% versus 20.3% in Palm bay.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 19.6% in Palm bay.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palm bay at 15.8% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 34.9% in Palm bay.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Palm bay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Palm bay | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,215) | 4.2% (402) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (22,173) | 21.6% (2,064) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (14,805) | 28.6% (2,735) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (18,880) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palm bay vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.9% in Palm bay.
- In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 17.2% in Palm bay.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 11.5% in Palm bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palm bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.