Demographics details for Palm bay, FL vs Brighton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palm bay, FL vs Brighton, CO.
Data | Palm bay | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Population | 129,234 | 41,881 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $62,538 | $86,975 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Palm bay vs Brighton
- In Palm bay, the population is higher at 129,234, compared to 41,881 in Brighton.
- Residents in Palm bay have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 34.5 years in Brighton.
- Brighton has a higher median income of $86,975, compared to $62,538 in Palm bay.
- In Brighton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 37.0% in Palm bay.
- The poverty level is identical in both Palm bay and Brighton at 10%.
- Brighton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Palm bay.
Demographics
Demographics Palm bay vs Brighton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Palm bay | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 3 |
White | 51 | 42 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 17 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Palm bay vs Brighton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Palm bay at 18% compared to 3% in Brighton.
- Palm bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 42% in Brighton.
- Both Palm bay and Brighton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Brighton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 17% in Palm bay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brighton at 14%, compared to 12% in Palm bay.
- In Brighton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Palm bay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Palm bay | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 11.0% |
Depression | 20.3% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 21.5% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 30.9% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palm bay vs Brighton
- More residents in Palm bay report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.9% in Brighton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brighton at 21.6% versus 20.3% in Palm bay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palm bay at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Brighton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Brighton at 21.5% compared to 15.8% in Palm bay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Palm bay at 34.9% compared to 30.9% in Brighton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palm bay at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Brighton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Palm bay | Brighton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,215) | 1.6% (665) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (22,173) | 14.9% (6,256) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (14,805) | 18.0% (7,528) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (18,880) | 13.9% (5,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palm bay vs Brighton
- In Brighton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Palm bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palm bay hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 14.9% in Brighton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brighton at 18.0%, compared to 11.5% in Palm bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palm bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 13.9% in Brighton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.