Demographics details for Palatka, FL vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palatka, FL vs Fontana, CA.
Data | Palatka | Fontana |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,574 | 212,475 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 32.6 years |
Median Income | $30,945 | $93,230 |
Married Families | 18.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Palatka vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 10,574 in Palatka.
- Residents in Palatka have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $30,945 in Palatka.
- In Fontana, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 18.0% in Palatka.
- Palatka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 13% in Fontana.
- The unemployment rate in Palatka is higher at 5.5%, compared to 5.0% in Fontana.
Demographics
Demographics Palatka vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Palatka | Fontana |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 8 |
White | 43 | 2 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | 8 | 68 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Palatka vs Fontana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Palatka at 40% compared to 8% in Fontana.
- Palatka has a higher percentage of White residents at 43% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Palatka.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 8% in Palatka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 7% in Palatka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palatka and Fontana at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Palatka | Fontana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 12.6% |
Depression | 20.5% | 17.0% |
Smoking | 29.4% | 12.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palatka vs Fontana
- More residents in Palatka report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Palatka at 20.5% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palatka at 29.4% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fontana at 15.1% compared to 14.2% in Palatka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Palatka at 40.8% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palatka at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Palatka | Fontana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (111) | 2.2% (4,748) |
High School Diploma | 20.0% (2,118) | 16.3% (34,556) |
Less than High School | 22.0% (2,324) | 25.3% (53,655) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (841) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palatka vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.0% in Palatka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palatka hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 22.0% in Palatka.
- In Fontana, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Palatka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.