Demographics details for Palatka, FL vs Conyers, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palatka, FL vs Conyers, GA.
| Data | Palatka | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,574 | 17,926 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $30,945 | $53,500 |
| Married Families | 18.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Palatka vs Conyers
- The population in Conyers is higher at 17,926, compared to 10,574 in Palatka.
- Residents in Palatka have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 37.7 years in Conyers.
- Conyers has a higher median income of $53,500, compared to $30,945 in Palatka.
- In Conyers, the percentage of married families is higher at 21.0%, compared to 18.0% in Palatka.
- Palatka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 14% in Conyers.
- The unemployment rate in Palatka is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.2% in Conyers.
Demographics
Demographics Palatka vs Conyers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palatka | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 62 |
| White | 43 | 22 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palatka vs Conyers
- In Conyers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 40% in Palatka.
- Palatka has a higher percentage of White residents at 43% compared to 22% in Conyers.
- In Conyers, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Palatka.
- Conyers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 8% in Palatka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palatka at 7% compared to 4% in Conyers.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Palatka at 1% compared to 0% in Conyers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palatka | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 29.4% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 42.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palatka vs Conyers
- More residents in Palatka report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.2% in Conyers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Palatka at 20.5% compared to 20.1% in Conyers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palatka at 29.4% compared to 19.4% in Conyers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Palatka at 14.2% compared to 12.8% in Conyers.
- Conyers has higher obesity rates at 42.8% compared to 40.8% in Palatka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palatka at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Conyers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palatka | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (111) | 1.1% (204) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (2,118) | 14.8% (2,660) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (2,324) | 12.1% (2,169) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (841) | 17.4% (3,117) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palatka vs Conyers
- In Conyers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Palatka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palatka hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 14.8% in Conyers.
- More residents in Palatka have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 12.1% in Conyers.
- In Conyers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 8.0% in Palatka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.