Demographics details for Palatka, FL vs Arrington, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Palatka, FL vs Arrington, VA.
| Data | Palatka | Arrington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,574 | 1,226 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $30,945 | $58,144 |
| Married Families | 18.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Palatka vs Arrington
- In Palatka, the population is higher at 10,574, compared to 1,226 in Arrington.
- Residents in Palatka have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
- Arrington has a higher median income of $58,144, compared to $30,945 in Palatka.
- In Arrington, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 18.0% in Palatka.
- Palatka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in Arrington.
- The unemployment rate in Palatka is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Arrington.
Demographics
Demographics Palatka vs Arrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Palatka | Arrington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 41 |
| White | 43 | 59 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Palatka vs Arrington
- In Arrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 40% in Palatka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arrington at 59% compared to 43% in Palatka.
- The Asian population is larger in Palatka at 1% compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Palatka at 8% compared to 0% in Arrington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Palatka at 7% compared to 0% in Arrington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Palatka at 1% compared to 0% in Arrington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Palatka | Arrington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 29.4% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Palatka vs Arrington
- In Arrington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.4% in Palatka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arrington at 25.2% versus 20.5% in Palatka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Palatka at 29.4% compared to 23.1% in Arrington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arrington at 15.3% compared to 14.2% in Palatka.
- Arrington has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 40.8% in Palatka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Palatka at 21.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Palatka | Arrington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (111) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (2,118) | 17.0% (208) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (2,324) | 21.2% (260) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (841) | 20.1% (247) |
Education Levels Comparison: Palatka vs Arrington
- A higher percentage of residents in Palatka have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Arrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Palatka hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Arrington.
- More residents in Palatka have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 21.2% in Arrington.
- In Arrington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.1% compared to 8.0% in Palatka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.