Demographics details for Palatine, IL vs Cuyahoga falls, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Palatine, IL vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.

Data Palatine Cuyahoga falls
Population 65,485 50,655
Median Age 39.4 years 37.8 years
Median Income $93,383 $67,922
Married Families 44.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 4% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.8

Population Comparison: Palatine vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Palatine, the population is higher at 65,485, compared to 50,655 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Residents in Palatine have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Palatine has a higher median income of $93,383 compared to $67,922 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Palatine at 44.0% compared to 41.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 7%, compared to 4% in Palatine.
  • The unemployment rate in Palatine is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.8% in Cuyahoga falls.

Demographics

Demographics Palatine vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Palatine Cuyahoga falls
Black 5 5
White 57 81
Asian 13 6
Hispanic 20 3
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Palatine vs Cuyahoga falls

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Palatine and Cuyahoga falls at 5%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 81% compared to 57% in Palatine.
  • The Asian population is larger in Palatine at 13% compared to 6% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Palatine at 20% compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Both Palatine and Cuyahoga falls have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Palatine and Cuyahoga falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Palatine Cuyahoga falls
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 8.7% 11.1%
Depression 17.0% 25.1%
Smoking 11.3% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 18.8%
Obesity 26.8% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Palatine vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.7% in Palatine.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% versus 17.0% in Palatine.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 11.3% in Palatine.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Palatine at 18.9% compared to 18.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 26.8% in Palatine.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Palatine.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Palatine Cuyahoga falls
No Schooling 1.7% (1,095) 1.6% (825)
High School Diploma 11.6% (7,584) 19.4% (9,813)
Less than High School 12.3% (8,071) 6.3% (3,197)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.8% (23,474) 26.1% (13,215)

Education Levels Comparison: Palatine vs Cuyahoga falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Palatine have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.6% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 11.6% in Palatine.
  • More residents in Palatine have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Palatine hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 26.1% in Cuyahoga falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.