Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Pahrump | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,711 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $54,988 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Union city
- In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 27,895 in Union city.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Pahrump has a higher median income of $54,988 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pahrump at 45.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 10% in Pahrump.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 5.1% in Pahrump.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pahrump | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 85 |
| White | 69 | 6 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 2% in Pahrump.
- Pahrump has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Pahrump at 2% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 5% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pahrump at 10% compared to 4% in Union city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pahrump | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Union city
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pahrump at 24.4% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pahrump at 15.9% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 36.6% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pahrump | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.