Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Thompsons station, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Thompsons station, TN.

Data Pahrump Thompsons station
Population 44,711 8,199
Median Age 53.7 years 36.1 years
Median Income $54,988 $116,569
Married Families 45.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 10% 3%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 2.6

Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Thompsons station

  • In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 8,199 in Thompsons station.
  • Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 36.1 years in Thompsons station.
  • Thompsons station has a higher median income of $116,569, compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pahrump at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in Thompsons station.
  • Pahrump has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 3% in Thompsons station.
  • The unemployment rate in Pahrump is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.6% in Thompsons station.

Demographics

Demographics Pahrump vs Thompsons station provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pahrump Thompsons station
Black 2 2
White 69 84
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 16 1
Two or More Races 10 11
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Thompsons station

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pahrump and Thompsons station at 2%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Thompsons station at 84% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
  • In Thompsons station, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Pahrump.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 1% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thompsons station at 11%, compared to 10% in Pahrump.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0% in Thompsons station.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pahrump Thompsons station
Mental Health Not Good 20.8% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 9.3%
Depression 24.4% 24.3%
Smoking 23.0% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 17.0%
Obesity 38.5% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Thompsons station

  • More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 15.1% in Thompsons station.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pahrump at 24.4% compared to 24.3% in Thompsons station.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 13.5% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Thompsons station at 17.0% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 29.2% in Thompsons station.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 5.0% in Thompsons station.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pahrump Thompsons station
No Schooling 1.1% (507) 0.6% (51)
High School Diploma 23.0% (10,287) 11.2% (920)
Less than High School 20.5% (9,157) 4.1% (340)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.1% (4,495) 33.2% (2,725)

Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Thompsons station

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Thompsons station.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 11.2% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 4.1% in Thompsons station.
  • In Thompsons station, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.