Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Springfield, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Springfield, OR.
Data | Pahrump | Springfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,711 | 61,400 |
Median Age | 53.7 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $54,988 | $60,982 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Springfield
- The population in Springfield is higher at 61,400, compared to 44,711 in Pahrump.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 37.3 years in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher median income of $60,982, compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pahrump at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Springfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Pahrump and Springfield at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Pahrump is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.1% in Springfield.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Springfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pahrump | Springfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 69 | 73 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 16 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Springfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pahrump at 2% compared to 1% in Springfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Springfield at 73% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- Both Pahrump and Springfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 14% in Springfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pahrump at 10% compared to 9% in Springfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pahrump and Springfield at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pahrump | Springfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.3% |
Depression | 24.4% | 28.9% |
Smoking | 23.0% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Springfield
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.8% in Springfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springfield at 28.9% versus 24.4% in Pahrump.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 16.8% in Springfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Springfield at 16.9% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 36.4% in Springfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Springfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pahrump | Springfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 0.9% (528) |
High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 14.9% (9,128) |
Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 14.4% (8,821) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 14.2% (8,749) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Springfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Springfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 14.9% in Springfield.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 14.4% in Springfield.
- In Springfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.