Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Middle point, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Middle point, OH.
| Data | Pahrump | Middle point |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,711 | 565 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,988 | $54,479 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Middle point
- In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 565 in Middle point.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 37.0 years in Middle point.
- Pahrump has a higher median income of $54,988 compared to $54,479 in Middle point.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pahrump at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in Middle point.
- Pahrump has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Middle point.
- The unemployment rate in Pahrump is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Middle point.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Middle point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pahrump | Middle point |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 99 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Middle point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pahrump at 2% compared to 0% in Middle point.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Middle point at 99% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- The Asian population is larger in Pahrump at 2% compared to 0% in Middle point.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 0% in Middle point.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pahrump at 10% compared to 1% in Middle point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0% in Middle point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pahrump | Middle point |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Middle point
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.7% in Middle point.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pahrump at 24.4% compared to 23.4% in Middle point.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 18.5% in Middle point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Middle point at 19.3% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
- Middle point has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 38.5% in Pahrump.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Middle point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pahrump | Middle point |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 1.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 34.2% (193) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 13.1% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 9.4% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Middle point
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Pahrump and Middle point at 1.1%.
- In Middle point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 23.0% in Pahrump.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 13.1% in Middle point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 9.4% in Middle point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.