Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Litchfield park, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Litchfield park, AZ.
Data | Pahrump | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,711 | 6,960 |
Median Age | 53.7 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $54,988 | $117,601 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Litchfield park
- In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 47.7 years in Litchfield park.
- Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 45.0% in Pahrump.
- Pahrump has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pahrump and Litchfield park at 5.1%.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pahrump | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 2 |
White | 69 | 57 |
Asian | 2 | 6 |
Hispanic | 16 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Litchfield park
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pahrump and Litchfield park at 2%.
- Pahrump has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Pahrump.
- Litchfield park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 16% in Pahrump.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 10% in Pahrump.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0% in Litchfield park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pahrump | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 8.3% |
Depression | 24.4% | 18.9% |
Smoking | 23.0% | 10.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Litchfield park
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pahrump at 24.4% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pahrump | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 0.2% (16) |
High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 11.2% (777) |
Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 2.2% (150) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 36.0% (2,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.