Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Gilford, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Gilford, NH.
| Data | Pahrump | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,711 | 7,194 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 47.5 years |
| Median Income | $54,988 | $75,964 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 0.6% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Gilford
- In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 7,194 in Gilford.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 47.5 years in Gilford.
- Gilford has a higher median income of $75,964, compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pahrump at 45.0% compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- Pahrump has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Gilford.
- The unemployment rate in Pahrump is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Gilford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pahrump | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 0.5 |
| White | 69 | 96.2 |
| Asian | 2 | 0.7 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 1.6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 1.0 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pahrump at 2% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gilford at 96.2% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- The Asian population is larger in Pahrump at 2% compared to 0.7% in Gilford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pahrump at 10% compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pahrump | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Gilford
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pahrump at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pahrump at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pahrump | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.