Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Frankfort, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Frankfort, KY.
| Data | Pahrump | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,711 | 28,391 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 34.2 years |
| Median Income | $54,988 | $53,905 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Frankfort
- In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 28,391 in Frankfort.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 34.2 years in Frankfort.
- Pahrump has a higher median income of $54,988 compared to $53,905 in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pahrump at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Frankfort.
- The poverty level is higher in Frankfort at 12%, compared to 10% in Pahrump.
- The unemployment rate in Pahrump is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Frankfort.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Frankfort provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pahrump | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 12 |
| White | 69 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2% in Pahrump.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Frankfort at 71% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- In Frankfort, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Pahrump.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 6% in Frankfort.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pahrump at 10% compared to 8% in Frankfort.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pahrump | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Frankfort
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.1% in Frankfort.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Frankfort at 26.4% versus 24.4% in Pahrump.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 19.4% in Frankfort.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pahrump at 15.9% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 38.5% in Pahrump.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Frankfort.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pahrump | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 0.3% (89) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 15.3% (4,339) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 11.5% (3,279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 18.7% (5,295) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Frankfort
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 11.5% in Frankfort.
- In Frankfort, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.