Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Cochranville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Cochranville, PA.
| Data | Pahrump | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,711 | 488 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 49.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,988 | $92,292 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Cochranville
- In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 49.6 years in Cochranville.
- Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292, compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
- In Cochranville, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 45.0% in Pahrump.
- Pahrump has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Cochranville.
- The unemployment rate in Pahrump is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.0% in Cochranville.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Cochranville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pahrump | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pahrump at 2% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cochranville at 90% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- The Asian population is larger in Pahrump at 2% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 6% in Cochranville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pahrump at 10% compared to 4% in Cochranville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pahrump | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Cochranville
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 17.1% in Cochranville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pahrump at 24.4% compared to 24.1% in Cochranville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 19.8% in Cochranville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochranville at 17.5% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 35.6% in Cochranville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pahrump | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 24.4% (119) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 15.6% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 13.7% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 23.0% in Pahrump.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 15.6% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.