Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Addison, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Addison, IL.
| Data | Pahrump | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,711 | 35,127 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $54,988 | $82,547 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Addison
- In Pahrump, the population is higher at 44,711, compared to 35,127 in Addison.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 40.1 years in Addison.
- Addison has a higher median income of $82,547, compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pahrump at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Addison.
- Pahrump has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Addison.
- Addison has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.1% in Pahrump.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Addison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pahrump | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 69 | 32 |
| Asian | 2 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 42 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Addison
- In Addison, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Pahrump.
- Pahrump has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 32% in Addison.
- In Addison, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Pahrump.
- Addison has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 42%, compared to 16% in Pahrump.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Addison at 12%, compared to 10% in Pahrump.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pahrump and Addison at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pahrump | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Addison
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 14.2% in Addison.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pahrump at 24.4% compared to 17.7% in Addison.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 14.9% in Addison.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pahrump at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Addison.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 35.0% in Addison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Addison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pahrump | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 2.1% (744) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 19.0% (6,671) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 27.2% (9,554) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 17.1% (6,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Addison
- In Addison, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.1% in Pahrump.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 19.0% in Addison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Addison at 27.2%, compared to 20.5% in Pahrump.
- In Addison, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.