Demographics details for Paducah, KY vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Paducah, KY vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Paducah Sterling heights
Population 26,834 132,567
Median Age 42.7 years 41.2 years
Median Income $46,984 $75,381
Married Families 32.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 13% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Paducah vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 26,834 in Paducah.
  • Residents in Paducah have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $46,984 in Paducah.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Paducah.
  • Paducah has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Paducah is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics Paducah vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Paducah Sterling heights
Black 22 6
White 69 79
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Paducah vs Sterling heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paducah at 22% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 69% in Paducah.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Paducah.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Paducah at 3% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Paducah at 5% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paducah and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Paducah Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 20.4% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 11.4%
Depression 27.9% 25.5%
Smoking 24.5% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 13.5% 17.7%
Obesity 36.7% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Paducah vs Sterling heights

  • More residents in Paducah report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Paducah at 27.9% compared to 25.5% in Sterling heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Paducah at 24.5% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 13.5% in Paducah.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Paducah at 36.7% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Paducah at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Paducah Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.7% (193) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 19.5% (5,222) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 11.9% (3,195) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.9% (5,334) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Paducah vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.7% in Paducah.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Paducah hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 11.9% in Paducah.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 19.9% in Paducah.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.