Demographics details for Paducah, KY vs Norway, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paducah, KY vs Norway, IA.
| Data | Paducah | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,834 | 466 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 48.3 years |
| Median Income | $46,984 | $90,000 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Paducah vs Norway
- In Paducah, the population is higher at 26,834, compared to 466 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 42.7 years in Paducah.
- Norway has a higher median income of $90,000, compared to $46,984 in Paducah.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 32.0% in Paducah.
- Paducah has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The unemployment rate in Paducah is higher at 5.5%, compared to 2.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics Paducah vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paducah | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paducah vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paducah at 22% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 100% compared to 69% in Paducah.
- The Asian population is larger in Paducah at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paducah at 3% compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Paducah at 5% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paducah and Norway at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paducah | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paducah vs Norway
- More residents in Paducah report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 14.2% in Norway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paducah at 27.9% compared to 17.5% in Norway.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paducah at 24.5% compared to 14.7% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 22.9% compared to 13.5% in Paducah.
- Norway has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 36.7% in Paducah.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paducah at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Norway.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paducah | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (193) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.5% (5,222) | 33.5% (156) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (3,195) | 5.6% (26) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (5,334) | 10.5% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paducah vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in Paducah have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 19.5% in Paducah.
- More residents in Paducah have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 5.6% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paducah hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 10.5% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.