Demographics details for Paducah, KY vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paducah, KY vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Paducah | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,834 | 466 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $46,984 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Paducah vs Ash fork
- In Paducah, the population is higher at 26,834, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Paducah have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 38.6 years in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $46,984 in Paducah.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 32.0% in Paducah.
- Paducah has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- The unemployment rate in Paducah is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Paducah vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paducah | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 79 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paducah vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paducah at 22% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 69% in Paducah.
- The Asian population is larger in Paducah at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Paducah.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ash fork at 15%, compared to 5% in Paducah.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paducah and Ash fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paducah | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paducah vs Ash fork
- More residents in Paducah report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.4% in Ash fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paducah at 27.9% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paducah at 24.5% compared to 19.3% in Ash fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 13.5% in Paducah.
- Obesity rates are higher in Paducah at 36.7% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Paducah.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paducah | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (193) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.5% (5,222) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (3,195) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (5,334) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paducah vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Paducah have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paducah hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 11.9% in Paducah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paducah hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.