Demographics details for Pachuta, MS vs Garden city, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pachuta, MS vs Garden city, MN.

Data Pachuta Garden city
Population 199 221
Median Age 53.0 years 44.3 years
Median Income $31,964 $74,063
Married Families 36.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 21% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Pachuta vs Garden city

  • The population in Garden city is higher at 221, compared to 199 in Pachuta.
  • Residents in Pachuta have a higher median age of 53.0 years compared to 44.3 years in Garden city.
  • Garden city has a higher median income of $74,063, compared to $31,964 in Pachuta.
  • In Garden city, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 36.0% in Pachuta.
  • Pachuta has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 0% in Garden city.
  • The unemployment rate in Pachuta is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Garden city.

Demographics

Demographics Pachuta vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pachuta Garden city
Black 39 Data is updating
White 55 97
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races 6 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pachuta vs Garden city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pachuta at 39% compared to 0% in Garden city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Garden city at 97% compared to 55% in Pachuta.
  • Both Pachuta and Garden city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Garden city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Pachuta.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pachuta at 6% compared to 2% in Garden city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pachuta and Garden city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pachuta Garden city
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.4% 8.5%
Depression 24.7% 23.6%
Smoking 25.8% 16.4%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 22.7%
Obesity 47.3% 33.7%
Disability Percentage 36.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pachuta vs Garden city

  • More residents in Pachuta report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 14.2% in Garden city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pachuta at 24.7% compared to 23.6% in Garden city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pachuta at 25.8% compared to 16.4% in Garden city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Garden city at 22.7% compared to 12.9% in Pachuta.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pachuta at 47.3% compared to 33.7% in Garden city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 14.0% in Garden city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pachuta Garden city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.1% (32) 19.9% (44)
Less than High School 24.6% (49) 6.3% (14)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.0% (16) 10.9% (24)

Education Levels Comparison: Pachuta vs Garden city

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Pachuta and Garden city at 0.0%.
  • In Garden city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 16.1% in Pachuta.
  • More residents in Pachuta have less than a high school education at 24.6% compared to 6.3% in Garden city.
  • In Garden city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 8.0% in Pachuta.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.