Demographics details for Pachuta, MS vs Cedar grove, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pachuta, MS vs Cedar grove, NJ.

Data Pachuta Cedar grove
Population 199 12,549
Median Age 53.0 years 42.5 years
Median Income $31,964 $107,500
Married Families 36.0% 68.2%
Poverty Level 21% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.3

Population Comparison: Pachuta vs Cedar grove

  • The population in Cedar grove is higher at 12,549, compared to 199 in Pachuta.
  • Residents in Pachuta have a higher median age of 53.0 years compared to 42.5 years in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher median income of $107,500, compared to $31,964 in Pachuta.
  • In Cedar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.2%, compared to 36.0% in Pachuta.
  • Pachuta has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 5% in Cedar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Pachuta is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.3% in Cedar grove.

Demographics

Demographics Pachuta vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pachuta Cedar grove
Black 39 1.2
White 55 89.5
Asian Data is updating 5.2
Hispanic Data is updating 3.1
Two or More Races 6 1.0
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pachuta vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pachuta at 39% compared to 1.2% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 89.5% compared to 55% in Pachuta.
  • In Cedar grove, the Asian population stands at 5.2%, greater than 0% in Pachuta.
  • Cedar grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3.1%, compared to 0% in Pachuta.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pachuta at 6% compared to 1.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pachuta and Cedar grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pachuta Cedar grove
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 15.4% Data is updating%
Depression 24.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 25.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 12.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 47.3% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 36.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pachuta vs Cedar grove

  • More residents in Pachuta report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pachuta at 24.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pachuta at 25.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pachuta at 12.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pachuta at 47.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pachuta Cedar grove
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.1% (32) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 24.6% (49) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.0% (16) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Pachuta vs Cedar grove

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Pachuta and Cedar grove at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pachuta hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents in Pachuta have less than a high school education at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pachuta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.