Demographics details for Ozark, MO vs Princeton, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ozark, MO vs Princeton, LA.
| Data | Ozark | Princeton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,512 | 1,554 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,631 | $48,500 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Ozark vs Princeton
- In Ozark, the population is higher at 22,512, compared to 1,554 in Princeton.
- The median age in Princeton is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 33.1 years in Ozark.
- Ozark has a higher median income of $66,631 compared to $48,500 in Princeton.
- In Princeton, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 38.0% in Ozark.
- The poverty level is higher in Princeton at 15%, compared to 9% in Ozark.
- Princeton has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.5% in Ozark.
Demographics
Demographics Ozark vs Princeton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ozark | Princeton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 50 |
| White | 89 | 48 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ozark vs Princeton
- In Princeton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 50% compared to 2% in Ozark.
- Ozark has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 48% in Princeton.
- Both Ozark and Princeton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ozark at 4% compared to 2% in Princeton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ozark at 5% compared to 0% in Princeton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ozark and Princeton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ozark | Princeton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ozark vs Princeton
- More residents in Ozark report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ozark at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ozark at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ozark at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ozark at 34.7% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ozark at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ozark | Princeton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (141) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (2,744) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (2,003) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.8% (4,691) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ozark vs Princeton
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark hold a high school diploma at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- More residents in Ozark have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Princeton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.