Demographics details for Ozark, AL vs Yucca valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ozark, AL vs Yucca valley, CA.
| Data | Ozark | Yucca valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,299 | 21,662 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $47,407 | $54,153 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Ozark vs Yucca valley
- The population in Yucca valley is higher at 21,662, compared to 14,299 in Ozark.
- Residents in Ozark have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 39.9 years in Yucca valley.
- Yucca valley has a higher median income of $54,153, compared to $47,407 in Ozark.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ozark at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Yucca valley.
- Ozark has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Yucca valley.
- Yucca valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Ozark.
Demographics
Demographics Ozark vs Yucca valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ozark | Yucca valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 4 |
| White | 57 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Ozark vs Yucca valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ozark at 30% compared to 4% in Yucca valley.
- Ozark has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 51% in Yucca valley.
- Both Ozark and Yucca valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Yucca valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 7% in Ozark.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yucca valley at 16%, compared to 3% in Ozark.
- In Yucca valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Ozark.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ozark | Yucca valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ozark vs Yucca valley
- More residents in Ozark report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 19.2% in Yucca valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ozark at 23.6% compared to 22.0% in Yucca valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ozark at 21.7% compared to 16.7% in Yucca valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yucca valley at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Ozark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ozark at 40.3% compared to 38.8% in Yucca valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ozark at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Yucca valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ozark | Yucca valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (267) | 0.9% (191) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,251) | 17.3% (3,754) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (2,307) | 15.6% (3,383) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (1,831) | 13.4% (2,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ozark vs Yucca valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.9% in Yucca valley.
- In Yucca valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 15.7% in Ozark.
- More residents in Ozark have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Yucca valley.
- In Yucca valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 12.8% in Ozark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.