Demographics details for Ozark, AL vs White house, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ozark, AL vs White house, TN.
| Data | Ozark | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,299 | 14,516 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $47,407 | $85,404 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Ozark vs White house
- The population in White house is higher at 14,516, compared to 14,299 in Ozark.
- Residents in Ozark have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 36.5 years in White house.
- White house has a higher median income of $85,404, compared to $47,407 in Ozark.
- In White house, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 36.0% in Ozark.
- Ozark has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in White house.
- The unemployment rate in Ozark is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in White house.
Demographics
Demographics Ozark vs White house provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ozark | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 2 |
| White | 57 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ozark vs White house
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ozark at 30% compared to 2% in White house.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in White house at 87% compared to 57% in Ozark.
- The Asian population is larger in Ozark at 2% compared to 1% in White house.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ozark at 7% compared to 4% in White house.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in White house at 6%, compared to 3% in Ozark.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ozark at 1% compared to 0% in White house.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ozark | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ozark vs White house
- More residents in Ozark report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 17.5% in White house.
- Higher depression rates are seen in White house at 27.6% versus 23.6% in Ozark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ozark at 21.7% compared to 17.7% in White house.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in White house at 16.7% compared to 14.7% in Ozark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ozark at 40.3% compared to 32.5% in White house.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ozark at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in White house.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ozark | White house |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (267) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,251) | 18.0% (2,617) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (2,307) | 12.4% (1,794) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (1,831) | 15.4% (2,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ozark vs White house
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.2% in White house.
- In White house, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Ozark.
- More residents in Ozark have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 12.4% in White house.
- In White house, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 12.8% in Ozark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.