Demographics details for Ozark, AL vs Mountain grove, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ozark, AL vs Mountain grove, MO.
Data | Ozark | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,299 | 4,551 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 42.3 years |
Median Income | $47,407 | $38,103 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Ozark vs Mountain grove
- In Ozark, the population is higher at 14,299, compared to 4,551 in Mountain grove.
- The median age in Mountain grove is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 40.9 years in Ozark.
- Ozark has a higher median income of $47,407 compared to $38,103 in Mountain grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ozark at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Mountain grove.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ozark and Mountain grove at 15%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Ozark and Mountain grove at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Ozark vs Mountain grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ozark | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | Data is updating |
White | 57 | 89 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ozark vs Mountain grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ozark at 30% compared to 0% in Mountain grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mountain grove at 89% compared to 57% in Ozark.
- The Asian population is larger in Ozark at 2% compared to 1% in Mountain grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ozark at 7% compared to 2% in Mountain grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mountain grove at 8%, compared to 3% in Ozark.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ozark at 1% compared to 0% in Mountain grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ozark | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 22.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 18.1% |
Depression | 23.6% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 21.7% | 31.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ozark vs Mountain grove
- In Mountain grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 20.1% in Ozark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain grove at 28.4% versus 23.6% in Ozark.
- Mountain grove has a higher smoking rate at 31.2% compared to 21.7% in Ozark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mountain grove at 14.8% compared to 14.7% in Ozark.
- Mountain grove has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 40.3% in Ozark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain grove at 24.0% compared to 23.0% in Ozark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ozark | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (267) | 0.6% (26) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,251) | 27.6% (1,256) |
Less than High School | 16.1% (2,307) | 23.2% (1,057) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (1,831) | 8.8% (400) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ozark vs Mountain grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.6% in Mountain grove.
- In Mountain grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 15.7% in Ozark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mountain grove at 23.2%, compared to 16.1% in Ozark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 8.8% in Mountain grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.