Demographics details for Ozark, AL vs Massapequa park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ozark, AL vs Massapequa park, NY.
Data | Ozark | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,299 | 16,873 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 43.7 years |
Median Income | $47,407 | $161,193 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ozark vs Massapequa park
- The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 14,299 in Ozark.
- The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 40.9 years in Ozark.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $47,407 in Ozark.
- In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 36.0% in Ozark.
- Ozark has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- The unemployment rate in Ozark is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.
Demographics
Demographics Ozark vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ozark | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 1 |
White | 57 | 88 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ozark vs Massapequa park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ozark at 30% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 57% in Ozark.
- Both Ozark and Massapequa park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ozark at 7% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Massapequa park at 4%, compared to 3% in Ozark.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ozark at 1% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ozark | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 13.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 8.0% |
Depression | 23.6% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 21.7% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 26.4% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ozark vs Massapequa park
- More residents in Ozark report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ozark at 23.6% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ozark at 21.7% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 14.7% in Ozark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ozark at 40.3% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ozark at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ozark | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (267) | 0.3% (45) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,251) | 15.3% (2,586) |
Less than High School | 16.1% (2,307) | 3.8% (641) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (1,831) | 36.6% (6,183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ozark vs Massapequa park
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
- More residents in Ozark have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 12.8% in Ozark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.