Demographics details for Oxford, NJ vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oxford, NJ vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Oxford | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,249 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 43.1 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $60,833 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Oxford vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 1,249 in Oxford.
- Residents in Oxford have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929, compared to $60,833 in Oxford.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Oxford.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 5% in Oxford.
- Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Oxford.
Demographics
Demographics Oxford vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oxford | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 77 | 52 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Oxford vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Oxford.
- Oxford has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- Both Oxford and Cleburne have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 16% in Oxford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 4% in Oxford.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Oxford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oxford | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 31.2% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oxford vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.5% in Oxford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cleburne at 23.6% versus 23.4% in Oxford.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 16.2% in Oxford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oxford at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 31.2% in Oxford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Oxford at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oxford | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 29.1% (364) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (164) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (266) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oxford vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Oxford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oxford hold a high school diploma at 29.1% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 13.1% in Oxford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oxford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.