Demographics details for Oxford, AL vs Yakima, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oxford, AL vs Yakima, WA.
| Data | Oxford | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,002 | 97,012 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $66,031 | $55,734 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Oxford vs Yakima
- The population in Yakima is higher at 97,012, compared to 22,002 in Oxford.
- Residents in Oxford have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Oxford has a higher median income of $66,031 compared to $55,734 in Yakima.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Oxford at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 10% in Oxford.
- Yakima has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Oxford.
Demographics
Demographics Oxford vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oxford | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 1 |
| White | 73 | 34 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Oxford vs Yakima
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oxford at 16% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- Oxford has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- Both Oxford and Yakima have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Yakima has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 7% in Oxford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 3% in Oxford.
- In Yakima, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Oxford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oxford | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oxford vs Yakima
- More residents in Oxford report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.5% in Yakima.
- Depression is more prevalent in Oxford at 23.8% compared to 23.6% in Yakima.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oxford at 19.8% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yakima at 15.4% compared to 15.1% in Oxford.
- Yakima has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 37.4% in Oxford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Oxford at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Yakima.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oxford | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (306) | 1.8% (1,748) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (3,534) | 13.4% (12,983) |
| Less than High School | 17.9% (3,933) | 27.9% (27,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (3,625) | 12.1% (11,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oxford vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in Oxford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oxford hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 17.9% in Oxford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oxford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 12.1% in Yakima.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.