Demographics details for Owosso, MI vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Owosso, MI vs Klamath falls, OR.
Data | Owosso | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,629 | 21,977 |
Median Age | 37.2 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $51,794 | $46,695 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Owosso vs Klamath falls
- The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 14,629 in Owosso.
- Residents in Owosso have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Owosso has a higher median income of $51,794 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Owosso at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 12% in Owosso.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Owosso and Klamath falls at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Owosso vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Owosso | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 92 | 69 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Owosso vs Klamath falls
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Owosso and Klamath falls at 1%.
- Owosso has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
- In Klamath falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Owosso.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 4% in Owosso.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 3% in Owosso.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Owosso.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Owosso | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.4% |
Depression | 28.0% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 22.7% | 19.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 37.7% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Owosso vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.4% in Owosso.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 28.0% in Owosso.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Owosso at 22.7% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Owosso at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Owosso at 37.7% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Owosso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Owosso | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (84) | 0.9% (192) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (2,724) | 16.0% (3,508) |
Less than High School | 15.8% (2,305) | 15.5% (3,401) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,745) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Owosso vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Owosso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Owosso hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
- More residents in Owosso have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
- In Klamath falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.9% in Owosso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.