Demographics details for Owasso, OK vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Owasso, OK vs Central point, OR.
Data | Owasso | Central point |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,328 | 19,222 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $79,183 | $79,731 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Owasso vs Central point
- In Owasso, the population is higher at 39,328, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
- The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 33.5 years in Owasso.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $79,183 in Owasso.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 39.0% in Owasso.
- The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 9% in Owasso.
- Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Owasso.
Demographics
Demographics Owasso vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Owasso | Central point |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 69 | 76 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
American Indian | 8 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Owasso vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Owasso at 4% compared to 0% in Central point.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 69% in Owasso.
- The Asian population is larger in Owasso at 2% compared to 1% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 7% in Owasso.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Owasso at 10% compared to 7% in Central point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Owasso at 8% compared to 1% in Central point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Owasso | Central point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.0% |
Depression | 25.1% | 29.4% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 34.3% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Owasso vs Central point
- In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.8% in Owasso.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 25.1% in Owasso.
- Central point has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Owasso.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 15.3% in Owasso.
- Obesity rates are higher in Owasso at 34.3% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Owasso at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Owasso | Central point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (142) | 1.7% (319) |
High School Diploma | 13.0% (5,117) | 16.1% (3,095) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (2,336) | 13.2% (2,530) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.1% (8,293) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Owasso vs Central point
- In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Owasso.
- In Central point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 13.0% in Owasso.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 5.9% in Owasso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Owasso hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.