Demographics details for Ovid, CO vs Chandler, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ovid, CO vs Chandler, AZ.
Data | Ovid | Chandler |
---|---|---|
Population | 259 | 280,711 |
Median Age | 55.0 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $28,409 | $99,374 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Ovid vs Chandler
- The population in Chandler is higher at 280,711, compared to 259 in Ovid.
- Residents in Ovid have a higher median age of 55.0 years compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374, compared to $28,409 in Ovid.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ovid at 43.0% compared to 41.0% in Chandler.
- Ovid has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- The unemployment rate in Ovid is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Ovid vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ovid | Chandler |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 60 | 48 |
Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
Hispanic | 29 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Ovid vs Chandler
- In Chandler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Ovid.
- Ovid has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Ovid.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ovid at 29% compared to 21% in Chandler.
- Both Ovid and Chandler have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Ovid.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ovid | Chandler |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 9.0% |
Depression | 23.8% | 18.5% |
Smoking | 18.9% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 29.0% | 27.9% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ovid vs Chandler
- More residents in Ovid report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ovid at 23.8% compared to 18.5% in Chandler.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ovid at 18.9% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ovid at 18.9% compared to 18.2% in Chandler.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ovid at 29.0% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ovid at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ovid | Chandler |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (3) | 0.8% (2,196) |
High School Diploma | 21.2% (55) | 10.1% (28,272) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (30) | 6.8% (18,988) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (42) | 31.0% (86,947) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ovid vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Ovid have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ovid hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- More residents in Ovid have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 16.2% in Ovid.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.