Demographics details for Otto, NC vs Farmington hills, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Otto, NC vs Farmington hills, MI.

Data Otto Farmington hills
Population 1,000 82,737
Median Age 45.0 years 41.6 years
Median Income $50,000 $101,728
Married Families 300.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 2.8

Population Comparison: Otto vs Farmington hills

  • The population in Farmington hills is higher at 82,737, compared to 1,000 in Otto.
  • Residents in Otto have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 41.6 years in Farmington hills.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728, compared to $50,000 in Otto.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Otto at 300.0% compared to 44.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Otto has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Otto is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Otto vs Farmington hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Otto Farmington hills
Black 5 18
White 95 59
Asian Data is updating 15
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Otto vs Farmington hills

  • In Farmington hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 5% in Otto.
  • Otto has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
  • In Farmington hills, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Otto.
  • Farmington hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Otto.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Farmington hills at 6%, compared to 0% in Otto.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Otto and Farmington hills at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Otto Farmington hills
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 8.0%
Depression Data is updating% 19.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 11.4%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 29.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Otto vs Farmington hills

  • In Farmington hills, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Otto.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington hills at 19.0% versus 0.0% in Otto.
  • Farmington hills has a higher smoking rate at 11.4% compared to 0.0% in Otto.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Otto.
  • Farmington hills has higher obesity rates at 29.1% compared to 0.0% in Otto.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington hills at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Otto.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Otto Farmington hills
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (488)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.5% (7,900)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.0% (4,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 42.2% (34,948)

Education Levels Comparison: Otto vs Farmington hills

  • In Farmington hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Otto.
  • In Farmington hills, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.5% compared to 0.0% in Otto.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington hills at 6.0%, compared to 0.0% in Otto.
  • In Farmington hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 0.0% in Otto.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.