Demographics details for Otsego, MI vs Hazel, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Otsego, MI vs Hazel, KY.
| Data | Otsego | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,069 | 398 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $68,490 | $36,765 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Otsego vs Hazel
- In Otsego, the population is higher at 4,069, compared to 398 in Hazel.
- Residents in Otsego have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 38.8 years in Hazel.
- Otsego has a higher median income of $68,490 compared to $36,765 in Hazel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Otsego at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Hazel.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazel at 14%, compared to 8% in Otsego.
- Hazel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.3% in Otsego.
Demographics
Demographics Otsego vs Hazel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Otsego | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 85 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Otsego vs Hazel
- In Hazel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Otsego.
- Otsego has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 76% in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Otsego.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Otsego and Hazel at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Otsego at 10% compared to 6% in Hazel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Otsego at 1% compared to 0% in Hazel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Otsego | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Otsego vs Hazel
- In Hazel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.2% in Otsego.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hazel at 27.6% versus 25.2% in Otsego.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Otsego at 19.8% compared to 19.0% in Hazel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Otsego at 17.1% compared to 15.0% in Hazel.
- Hazel has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.8% in Otsego.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel at 35.0% compared to 12.0% in Otsego.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Otsego | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (73) | 0.8% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 24.4% (994) | 21.9% (87) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (852) | 21.1% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (291) | 9.0% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Otsego vs Hazel
- A higher percentage of residents in Otsego have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Hazel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Otsego hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 21.9% in Hazel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel at 21.1%, compared to 20.9% in Otsego.
- In Hazel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 7.2% in Otsego.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.