Demographics details for Ostrander, MN vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ostrander, MN vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Ostrander | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 227 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $69,583 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Ostrander vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 61,222, compared to 227 in Ostrander.
- Residents in Ostrander have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615, compared to $69,583 in Ostrander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ostrander at 52.0% compared to 45.0% in Parker.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ostrander and Parker at 5%.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 2.5% in Ostrander.
Demographics
Demographics Ostrander vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ostrander | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 92 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ostrander vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ostrander at 3% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Ostrander has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 73% in Parker.
- In Parker, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Ostrander.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Ostrander.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 4% in Ostrander.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ostrander at 1% compared to 0% in Parker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ostrander | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ostrander vs Parker
- More residents in Ostrander report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ostrander at 23.3% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ostrander at 19.7% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ostrander at 20.8% compared to 18.9% in Parker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ostrander at 34.7% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ostrander at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ostrander | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (2) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 33.5% (76) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (40) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (39) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ostrander vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Ostrander have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ostrander hold a high school diploma at 33.5% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- More residents in Ostrander have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 17.2% in Ostrander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.