Demographics details for Ostrander, MN vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ostrander, MN vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Ostrander Grand junction
Population 227 68,034
Median Age 37.8 years 39.9 years
Median Income $69,583 $62,993
Married Families 52.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Ostrander vs Grand junction

  • The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 227 in Ostrander.
  • The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.8 years in Ostrander.
  • Ostrander has a higher median income of $69,583 compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Ostrander at 52.0% compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
  • The poverty level is higher in Grand junction at 10%, compared to 5% in Ostrander.
  • Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.5% in Ostrander.

Demographics

Demographics Ostrander vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ostrander Grand junction
Black 3 1
White 92 73
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 16
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Ostrander vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ostrander at 3% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Ostrander has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ostrander.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 0% in Ostrander.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 4% in Ostrander.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ostrander and Grand junction at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ostrander Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 11.8%
Depression 23.3% 24.5%
Smoking 19.7% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 20.8% 19.2%
Obesity 34.7% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ostrander vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.5% in Ostrander.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 23.3% in Ostrander.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ostrander at 19.7% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Ostrander at 20.8% compared to 19.2% in Grand junction.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Ostrander at 34.7% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Ostrander.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ostrander Grand junction
No Schooling 0.9% (2) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 33.5% (76) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 17.6% (40) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.2% (39) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Ostrander vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of residents in Ostrander have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ostrander hold a high school diploma at 33.5% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • More residents in Ostrander have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 17.2% in Ostrander.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.