Demographics details for Ostrander, MN vs Arrington, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ostrander, MN vs Arrington, VA.
Data | Ostrander | Arrington |
---|---|---|
Population | 227 | 1,226 |
Median Age | 37.8 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $69,583 | $58,144 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ostrander vs Arrington
- The population in Arrington is higher at 1,226, compared to 227 in Ostrander.
- Residents in Ostrander have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
- Ostrander has a higher median income of $69,583 compared to $58,144 in Arrington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ostrander at 52.0% compared to 40.0% in Arrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Arrington at 8%, compared to 5% in Ostrander.
- Arrington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Ostrander.
Demographics
Demographics Ostrander vs Arrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ostrander | Arrington |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 41 |
White | 92 | 59 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ostrander vs Arrington
- In Arrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 3% in Ostrander.
- Ostrander has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 59% in Arrington.
- Both Ostrander and Arrington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Ostrander and Arrington at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ostrander at 4% compared to 0% in Arrington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ostrander at 1% compared to 0% in Arrington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ostrander | Arrington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Depression | 23.3% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 19.7% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 15.3% |
Obesity | 34.7% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ostrander vs Arrington
- In Arrington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.5% in Ostrander.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arrington at 25.2% versus 23.3% in Ostrander.
- Arrington has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 19.7% in Ostrander.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ostrander at 20.8% compared to 15.3% in Arrington.
- Arrington has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 34.7% in Ostrander.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ostrander at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ostrander | Arrington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 33.5% (76) | 17.0% (208) |
Less than High School | 17.6% (40) | 21.2% (260) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (39) | 20.1% (247) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ostrander vs Arrington
- A higher percentage of residents in Ostrander have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Arrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ostrander hold a high school diploma at 33.5% compared to 17.0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arrington at 21.2%, compared to 17.6% in Ostrander.
- In Arrington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Ostrander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.