Demographics details for Ortonville, MI vs Helper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ortonville, MI vs Helper, UT.
| Data | Ortonville | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,331 | 2,131 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 43.2 years |
| Median Income | $92,411 | $59,323 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Ortonville vs Helper
- The population in Helper is higher at 2,131, compared to 1,331 in Ortonville.
- The median age in Helper is higher at 43.2 years, compared to 42.4 years in Ortonville.
- Ortonville has a higher median income of $92,411 compared to $59,323 in Helper.
- In Helper, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 39.0% in Ortonville.
- The poverty level is higher in Helper at 11%, compared to 7% in Ortonville.
- The unemployment rate in Ortonville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Helper.
Demographics
Demographics Ortonville vs Helper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ortonville | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ortonville vs Helper
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Ortonville and Helper at 0%.
- Ortonville has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 85% in Helper.
- Both Ortonville and Helper have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Helper has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in Ortonville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ortonville at 6% compared to 5% in Helper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ortonville and Helper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ortonville | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 33.3% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ortonville vs Helper
- More residents in Ortonville report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.1% in Helper.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Helper at 25.3% versus 24.2% in Ortonville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ortonville at 18.3% compared to 11.5% in Helper.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ortonville at 18.4% compared to 14.2% in Helper.
- Helper has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 33.3% in Ortonville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Helper at 26.0% compared to 8.0% in Ortonville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ortonville | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (18) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (202) | 23.4% (499) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (118) | 8.7% (185) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (223) | 18.7% (399) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ortonville vs Helper
- A higher percentage of residents in Ortonville have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Helper.
- In Helper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 15.2% in Ortonville.
- More residents in Ortonville have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 8.7% in Helper.
- In Helper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 16.8% in Ortonville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.