Demographics details for Orlando, FL vs Brooklyn, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Orlando, FL vs Brooklyn, CT.
Data | Orlando | Brooklyn |
---|---|---|
Population | 316,081 | 8,244 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $66,292 | $80,945 |
Married Families | 31.0% | Data is updating |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Orlando vs Brooklyn
- In Orlando, the population is higher at 316,081, compared to 8,244 in Brooklyn.
- The median age in Brooklyn is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 34.7 years in Orlando.
- Brooklyn has a higher median income of $80,945, compared to $66,292 in Orlando.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Orlando at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Orlando has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Brooklyn.
- The unemployment rate in Orlando is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Brooklyn.
Demographics
Demographics Orlando vs Brooklyn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Orlando | Brooklyn |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | Data is updating |
White | 23 | 100 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 34 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 16 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Orlando vs Brooklyn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Orlando at 23% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brooklyn at 100% compared to 23% in Orlando.
- The Asian population is larger in Orlando at 4% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Orlando at 34% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Orlando at 16% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Orlando and Brooklyn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Orlando | Brooklyn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 31.1% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Orlando vs Brooklyn
- More residents in Orlando report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Orlando at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Orlando at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Orlando at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Orlando at 31.1% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Orlando at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Orlando | Brooklyn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (3,445) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (43,377) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 9.2% (29,000) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.8% (90,981) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Orlando vs Brooklyn
- A higher percentage of residents in Orlando have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Orlando hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- More residents in Orlando have less than a high school education at 9.2% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Orlando hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.