Demographics details for Orland park, IL vs Rockingham, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Orland park, IL vs Rockingham, NC.

Data Orland park Rockingham
Population 57,511 91,957
Median Age 46.6 years 45.1 years
Median Income $97,365 $50,737
Married Families 48.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 6% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 4.5

Population Comparison: Orland park vs Rockingham

  • The population in Rockingham is higher at 91,957, compared to 57,511 in Orland park.
  • Residents in Orland park have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 45.1 years in Rockingham.
  • Orland park has a higher median income of $97,365 compared to $50,737 in Rockingham.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Orland park at 48.0% compared to 41.0% in Rockingham.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rockingham at 13%, compared to 6% in Orland park.
  • The unemployment rate in Orland park is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Rockingham.

Demographics

Demographics Orland park vs Rockingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Orland park Rockingham
Black 4 17
White 76 70
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 10 6
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Orland park vs Rockingham

  • In Rockingham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 4% in Orland park.
  • Orland park has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 70% in Rockingham.
  • The Asian population is larger in Orland park at 5% compared to 1% in Rockingham.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Orland park at 10% compared to 6% in Rockingham.
  • Both Orland park and Rockingham have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • In Rockingham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Orland park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Orland park Rockingham
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 12.6%
Depression 18.2% 24.9%
Smoking 11.7% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 20.2% 16.8%
Obesity 26.8% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Orland park vs Rockingham

  • In Rockingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 13.2% in Orland park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rockingham at 24.9% versus 18.2% in Orland park.
  • Rockingham has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 11.7% in Orland park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Orland park at 20.2% compared to 16.8% in Rockingham.
  • Rockingham has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 26.8% in Orland park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockingham at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Orland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Orland park Rockingham
No Schooling 0.5% (297) 0.8% (738)
High School Diploma 16.1% (9,262) 19.9% (18,325)
Less than High School 8.3% (4,763) 20.9% (19,256)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.9% (18,372) 11.1% (10,198)

Education Levels Comparison: Orland park vs Rockingham

  • In Rockingham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Orland park.
  • In Rockingham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 16.1% in Orland park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockingham at 20.9%, compared to 8.3% in Orland park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Orland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.9% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.